LDP Examination - Part 1 Extra Work Tasks
Matter 3 and 4 - Confirmation of SELEP funding
- Local Growth Fund Letter and Confirmation of ECC funding
Matter 2 - 2012 DCLG Household Projections
- Maldon District Council - Implications of DCLG's 2012-based Household Projections
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any further such comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
- Barton Wilmore's comments
- NLP's comments
- Plainview Planning's comments
- BROOD's comments
- EA Strategic Land's comments
Matter 2 - Legal Compliance
The Inspector has asked the Council to respond to his additional query on the Sustainability Appraisal of the Maldon District Local Development Plan. All participants are invited to comment on the two new court cases outlined in the Inspector's letter.
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
- Andrew Martin Planning's Letter
- Inspector's Letter - 17 March 2015
- Michael Brand's comments - 23 March 2015
- David Sargood's (HRA) comments - 31 March 2015
- Kath Vale's (SMAG) Response - 1 April 2015
Matter 2 - Barton Willmore SHMA
- Braintree, Chelmsford, Colchester and Tendring Councils- Response to BWSHMA
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
- Maldon District Council's comments
- Plainview Planning's comments
- Barton Willmore's comments
- Evolution Town Planning's comments
- David Sargood's (HRA) comments
- Michael Brand's comments
- Iceni Projects comments
Matter 8 - Viability Statement
- Maldon District Council Additional Viability Statement for LDP Examination
- CEG Endorsement
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
- Dartmouth Park Estate's response
- Plainview Planning's response
- Gladman Developments response
- Persimmon Homes / Strutt and Parker's response
- Strutt and Parker's response
Matter 5 - Primary Education Capacity
- Burnham-on-Crouch and Southminster Primary School Capacity Statement
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
- Burnham-on-Crouch Chamber of Commerce Letter
- John Hitcham's comments
- Burnham-on-Crouch Town Council's response
- BROOD's response
- Say No's response
The Inspector notes that the following additional paper confirms that Burnham-on-Crouch Primary School has a capacity of 390 places and not 417 as previously indicated. The Inspector invited both Essex County Council and Pigeon Land (Evolution) to respond to the Headteacher's letter.
- Nicky Patrick's additional paper (Headteacher's letter)
- Evolution Planning's response
- ECC's response
Matter 9 - Modifications to Policy H6
- Maldon District Council LDP - Further Modifications to Policy H6
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
Matter 9 - Inspector's additional query on Policy H6
The Inspector has asked the Council to respond to his additional queries regarding Policy H6 on Gypsies and Travellers. Participants are invited to comment on the second part of the query, regarding the Court Case.
- Maldon District Council's response to Inspector's additional queries
- Maldon District Council's response to Moore & Coates v Secretary of State
- Gordon and Yvonne Mussett's response
Overrun Session - Little Baddow Parish Council Submission
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments or replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
Matter 6 - Further modifications to Policy S2
Below are the comments submitted to the Inspector on the documents and tasks he requested at the hearings (see the Extra Work Tasks document). They are purely for information and the Inspector is not requesting any further comments or replies on them. Any such further comments of replies will be treated as unsolicited and may not be accepted by the Inspector (please see paragraph 4.31 of the Inspectorate's 'Procedural Practice').
- David Sargood's (HRA) comments
- Rosalind Oakley's comments
- Collins & Coward's comments
- Evolution Planning's comments
- Boyer Planning's comments
- Strutt and Parker's comments
- NLP's comments
- Dalton Warner Davis's comments
Statement of Common Ground